• balderdash@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Right. We consider the existence of God to be nonsense, because any god that was omnibenevolent wouldn’t be such a piece of shit, yet here we are in reality. Your premise is faulty.

    Yes, you are once again proving my point that you aren’t taking the “starting assumption” (i.e. the existence of a perfect God) seriously. It’s perfectly fine if your conception of God is of a terrible serial killer, I am not trying to convince you otherwise, but now we aren’t talking about the same God.

    • realbadat@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yours cannot possibly exist, and you aren’t allowing for any opinion other than your own.

      So yes, if you want to assume there was some benevolent god, and the collective opinion of folks on heaven/hell would change.

      But as that God cannot possibly exist, and has no basis in reality in so many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many… Many ways. Many.

      So we are going off of the various religions and religious figures that do exist - and boy oh boy what hot garbage that God is! Including the one depicted by every Abrahamic religion. Which is why I keep saying your premise is broken, because the god depicted by Abrahamic religion is the garbage creature we do not want to be associated with.

      It’s a logical fallacy to start with.