• Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ad revenue is a portion of what the advertisers paid.

      YouTube DOES get its content for free. They pay YouTubers per view, essentially a portion of profit, whereas something like Netflix pays for the creation of content and then also a portion of profit made.

          • Tempotown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            How much data left is there to sell about me? Pretty sure they know pretty much everything about us already.

            My surfing habits change a little, but it’s mostly cyclical.

            • dtc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They don’t need new data to sell, they just find a new client who doesn’t have your info yet.

        • Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The point is that that’s in their own interest, because if they wouldn’t host it, they wouldn’t make any money.

          • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know you’re mostly joking, but Google does sell your data/browsing habits for advertising, being able to show car dealership ads to someone who’s browsing history indicates they’re in the market is extremely valuable. It’s not just about things “about you” like demographics/location, but an active, rolling profile about where you’re most likely to spend your money.

        • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Source on it being billions? All I could find was that they get 76PB/yr, which doesn’t add up to multiple EBs.

    • svahnen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe he is referring to the fact that YouTube don’t have to pay upfront for new content, they even get new content without hunting for it, and many smaller channels don’t have partnership and so on.

      Sure they have a platform, backend and so on. But Netflix needs to have all that too plus buy things to show to their customers.

      • ClassyDave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s what I thought, and it’s kind of a silly point to make. You’re just moving around the order of the steps. They still pay for it.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe he is referring to the fact that YouTube don’t have to pay upfront for new content, they even get new content without hunting for it, and many smaller channels don’t have partnership and so on.

        Well, sure, but on the other hand, those smaller creators couldn’t attract any attention or grow their audience without a platform to do it on. And, like it or not, youtube has that and doesn’t charge those new creators anything to use the platform (unlike platforms like Vimeo, as one example).

        Most of those large profitable channels wouldn’t have been able to grow totbhwir current size without a free to use platform to spread their content to a wider audience.

        There’s give and take on both sides.

          ;

        Of course, the payment share on ads and memberships is fair and equitable is a separate discussion…