Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoPrimeslemmy.mlimagemessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1705arrow-down136cross-posted to: mathhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1669arrow-down1imagePrimeslemmy.mlMarxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square89fedilinkcross-posted to: mathhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squarealvvayson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoThen you have one set that contains multiples of 3 and two sets that do not, so it is not symmetric.
minus-squarerbhfd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoYou’d have one set that are multiples of 3, one set that are multiples of 3 plus 1, and one stat that are multiples of 3 minus 1 (or plus 2)
minus-squarealvvayson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoHow do you people even math. You might as well use a composite number if you want to create useless sets of numbers.
Then you have one set that contains multiples of 3 and two sets that do not, so it is not symmetric.
You’d have one set that are multiples of 3, one set that are multiples of 3 plus 1, and one stat that are multiples of 3 minus 1 (or plus 2)
How do you people even math.
You might as well use a composite number if you want to create useless sets of numbers.