Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoPornhub blocks North Carolina and Montana as porn regulation spreadswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square405fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down113cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1external-linkPornhub blocks North Carolina and Montana as porn regulation spreadswww.theverge.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square405fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squareGanbat@lemmyonline.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoYou willfully associate yourself with an extremist in public, and I’m in the wrong for assuming you’re also an extremist? Lol. Lmao even.
minus-squareMySwellMojo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·10 months agoHmmm… I still agree with their original comment “it’s not fascist to try and stop kids from accessing porn”. I see that as pretty broad, and not necessarily indicating they want to collect information on people.
minus-squareGanbat@lemmyonline.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-210 months agoWanting to stop kids from accessing porn? Not fascist. Wanting to do it using force and/or violence? Fascist. Wilfully ignoring the context because it doesn’t suit your argument right now? Scummy.
minus-squareMySwellMojo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·10 months agoWhat comment of his was encouraging violence? I’m sorry, maybe I’m an airhead, but I didn’t get that context from him.
minus-squareGanbat@lemmyonline.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoWishing to go into people’s homes and forcefully enforce your opinions on them is inherently violent.
minus-squareMySwellMojo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoOh you’re right, I guess I interpreted that as an exaggeration
You willfully associate yourself with an extremist in public, and I’m in the wrong for assuming you’re also an extremist? Lol. Lmao even.
Hmmm… I still agree with their original comment “it’s not fascist to try and stop kids from accessing porn”.
I see that as pretty broad, and not necessarily indicating they want to collect information on people.
Wanting to stop kids from accessing porn? Not fascist.
Wanting to do it using force and/or violence? Fascist.
Wilfully ignoring the context because it doesn’t suit your argument right now? Scummy.
What comment of his was encouraging violence? I’m sorry, maybe I’m an airhead, but I didn’t get that context from him.
Wishing to go into people’s homes and forcefully enforce your opinions on them is inherently violent.
Oh you’re right, I guess I interpreted that as an exaggeration