• Exocrinous
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 months ago

    Autocomplete is usually an algorithm. LLMs are neural nets. There’s a fundamental technical distinction.

    But that’s not relevant, because we’re not talking about the technical details of LLMs. We’re talking about the technical details of human consciousness. And unless you can fully explain where human consciousness comes from, this debate is not settled.

    • magic_lobster_party
      link
      fedilink
      104 months ago

      There’s no fundamental technical distinction. Both are composed of the same machine instructions.

      LLM is just multiple matrix multiplications after one another until something useful is produced.

      • Exocrinous
        link
        fedilink
        English
        04 months ago

        So your argument is that consciousness in the human brain is explained by the fact ANNs are technically algorithms because they use Matrix multiplication?

        I think we can class you as a non-reasoning organism who just says whatever pattern of words sounds right.

        • magic_lobster_party
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          ANNs have very little to do with actual neurons. They’re just vaguely inspired by the latter. Only thing they have in common is that neurons is in the name.

          • Exocrinous
            link
            fedilink
            English
            04 months ago

            Okay but that’s still not an algorithm and it still has nothing to do with where human consciousness comes from. Are you even paying attention?

    • @Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -24 months ago

      I think it’s fun to take this debate a bit biblical too. We’re conscious because of our souls, which were created by God. At the same time, nothing in the Bible says that God can’t or wouldn’t give a soul to a self-aware AI too.