Well, you did just describe my experience with diet Pepsi pretty well…
Laurel Raven
- 0 Posts
- 578 Comments
Probably more because of how easy it is to drink than raw strength… It’s way easier to put away a bunch of 70 proof sweetened liqueur than the same amount of alcohol worth of 80+ proof hard liquor, very easy to not realize how much you’ve had until way too late
I’m pretty sure that’s regular Coke zero, unless they’ve changed the packaging again
But yeah, something about the artificial sweetener just doesn’t work with alcohol
And then Biff Tannen was elected US president
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
News@lemmy.world•FBI director posts photo of arrested Wisconsin judge’s perp walk, possibly violating DOJ policy
21·8 months agoNo one is above the law
Agreed… Maybe you should be telling your boss that…
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Trump, in blue, sleeping at Pope Francis' funeral
81·8 months agoI mean, I’m pretty sure he could get one quickly… He’s got plenty of money from all the bribes he’s been soliciting…
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
politics @lemmy.world•Americans, including Republicans, losing faith in Trump, new polls reveal
6·8 months agoEven when they do call him on it, any enforcement of that will be coming from agencies he’s loaded with sycophants
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devicesEnglish
2·8 months agoThat’s what I’ve heard… Getting real tired of people building great products only for corpos to find a way to make it terrible for an extra buck
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
News@lemmy.world•Mass. woman speaks out after video shows lCE agents smashing car window to get husband
1·8 months agoI wouldn’t be a bit surprised if it came out that he has special toilet paper printed with the Constitution’s text so he can literally wipe his ass with it
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devicesEnglish
2·8 months agoWell, I had been considering one, but I guess not
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
politics @lemmy.world•SHOCK POLL: AOC a Close Second Place Behind Kamala Harris in 2028 Democratic Primary
1·8 months agoAnd yet, the cops hated her…
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•inspired to find a man to take you for a ride to spaceEnglish
0·8 months agoI’m seeing no downside here…
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.world•Google Begins Testing 50 Gig Fiber InternetEnglish
1·1 year agoEvery few months I check to see if anyone’s built fiber to my area or if I’m still stuck with the choice between shit tier cable marketed as 1.2gbit (but rarely even gets halfway there, often below a tenth of that), something else that’s barely better than what we had twenty years ago, and wireless claiming to be 5G but performs like crap for everyone I know who’s tried it
I’ve only been looking for the last dozen or so years…
So damned sick of the bureaucratic bullshit
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.world•Cars Are Rolling Computers Now. So What Happens When They Stop Getting Updates?English
0·1 year agoYeah, but who wants their car to look like a Tesla? ;)
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.world•Cars Are Rolling Computers Now. So What Happens When They Stop Getting Updates?English
0·1 year agoHell, I could just bolt a laptop to the dash if I really wanted that
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Linux Gaming@lemmy.ml•Could Microsoft destroy Linux gaming by using the windows store
1·1 year agoIt might, if it worked well, but that’s a big “if” and as I suggested in my original post I don’t think it’s particularly likely they’ll do it either way
Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Linux Gaming@lemmy.ml•Could Microsoft destroy Linux gaming by using the windows store
31·1 year agoThere’d be no reason to. Anymore, I think they’d be more likely than that to try to port their Xbox game store to Linux than try to kill Linux gaming (though I doubt they’ll do that either)
That’s fair
It’s still a rather large pool to crack through even without adding more than the 1000 most common words, extra digits, minimal character substitution, capitalization tweaks, etc
That’s only really true if you’re going to be storing the password in a secure vault after randomly generating it; otherwise, it’s terrible because 1) nobody will be able to remember it so they’ll be writing it down, and 2) it’ll be such a pain to type that people will find ways to circumvent it at every possible turn
Pass phrases, even when taken with the idea that it’s a limited character set that follows a semi predictable flow, if you look at it in terms of the number of words possible it actually is decently secure, especially if the words used are random and not meaningful to the user. Even limiting yourself to the 1000 most common words in the English language and using 4 words, that’s one trillion possible combinations without even accounting for modifying capitalisation, adding a symbol or three, including a short number at the end…
And even with that base set, even if a computer could theoretically try all trillion possibilities quickly, it’ll make a ton of noise, get throttled, and likely lock the account out long before it has a chance to try even the tiniest fraction of them
Your way is theoretically more secure, but practically only works for machines or with secure password storage. If it’s something a human needs to remember and type themselves, phrases of random words is much more viable and much more likely to be used in a secure fashion.


I thought they didn’t block political figures… Guess the muskrat just meant the figures he agrees with…