This feels like a Rick and Morty episode.

“drinking 34 White Claws” = “Time served”

I like it!!!

The line is the one where they realize they can be held accountable and don’t trust ol’ donnie boy to give them a pardon. And I’m saying that applies both if she was actually complicit, and if she really was generally innocent but for continuing to say nothing once you know it’s happening and the gray is getting darker and darker. In either case it intersects with “oh fuck I’m unprotected”

“You’re spelling almost blue a vane in my fourhead”

FTFY

yeah I didn’t figure it was true. but had to say it still just in case. And whoever wrote it knew what they were implying / trying to generate internet feelings. Because again, it would be epic bad if troops in training, this early in, were THAT cynical.

If it really is true, I cannot stress enough just how bad it is. Like, really really bad.

Gen X has entered the chat

BYE FELICIA!

How long is that in Trusses?

With a huge side helping of mafia style blackmail. They stopped hiding it a long time ago.

I don’t believe you. PROVE IT!!!

Doesn’t matter. They are good enough to justify denial of clearance which means loss of job.

I have no faith that lawsuits will prevail here based on precedence supporting polygraphs as a credibility and suitability discriminator.

So? cheap labor?!

That’s the same argument I use for not having kids.

Also, I have a dog.

Yes and, you missed the last crucial step

“Make noise = human pay attention” “Human feeds and protects me = more kittens that probably know to pay attention” … “Profit”

Breaking news hahaha

You’re not wrong. But if you want to 1) eliminate any chance of assumed gender in “Boss” due to cultural history, and 2) have a little fun with moving the mark into the absurd, you’d appreciate what I’m saying.

I don’t agree that 11% undecided in the primary is a “fairly significant public statement”, I mean, literally 11% is like, you know, small. Nor does a lack of policy change during the election cycle (which has a lot more factors than just Gaza to consider) immediately mean Kamala wouldn’t be open to changing tactics post election. But we’ll never know because, like I said, Trump won and now we get to find out if voting for him was net good or net bad for the Gaza cause.

But I can appreciate the emotional investment you have in “both sides-ing” this and ignoring the material differences between a narcissist that is already talking about lifting arms restrictions to Israel and Kamala.

Weather you agree with me or not is immaterial. On the issue of both parties being the same, you’re wrong. See how easy that is to say and it means nothing to an actual debate?

-Cheers

I didn’t ask which has the different policy now (ignoring my opinion about the truth of your assertion) but which is most likely to be responsive to public opinion; and I’d add, which one actually cares about the plight of others and which is an unofficially diagnosed narcissist.

But I’m fairly certain we won’t agree and sadly we’ll never know what Kamala coulda/woulda done. But with trump we’re about to Find Out. I hope we’re both wrong about him.