

And maybe just a couple annoying German protestor types, you know, to show they care. “Oops we could of sworn you were Ukrainian!”


And maybe just a couple annoying German protestor types, you know, to show they care. “Oops we could of sworn you were Ukrainian!”


Yeah such a funny concept haha, like it’s not a regulation, just: the signs can’t accommodate a higher price lol


I can’t remember where I read/saw the discussion (I think ion multiple commentator podcasts actually), but they were saying that this missle format, and the base striking strategy that Iran has been using has been oriented at achieving this exact scenario the whole time—basically keep kicking US off distributed bases forcing them to consolidate assets in fewer airfields farther away (distance means more planes in one place, and more on ground at a time because of limited maint and literal tarmac to takeoff and land) then once US is consolidated in these new locations, start hitting them with the fragmentation/multiple small warhead missles.
The point the one commentator was making was that when they used them a bit way back in isreal, the point wasn’t to cause destruction, but to announce their functionality / capability—so people were waving it off saying look, those bomblets hardly do any damage to the city! But the point was to let US know that they had them and could deliver them on target. Used against crowded airfields they are supremely effective—1m holes in runways are very disruptive to operations, and many planes with shrapnel/holes/“light” damage are also hugely disruptive. They don’t need to hit a plane directly, they just need to damage them, and then the plane has to be fully inspected vetted to make sure that nothing crucial has been broken.
The real cherry on top was the suspected plan for if US and Israel try and launch another major air offensive: they get half their aircraft up in the air for attack sorties, then Iran hits the consolidated airfields with these drag missles heavy and both takes remaining airframes off the table, but more importantly makes them impossible to land on, so the in-air sorties have to turn around and fly to med Europe to land, which pulls tankers off original paths and mission, and generally just breaks all operational tempo.
But you have to have the US Israel backed into a few major spots, so Iran has been patiently herding them back to Jordan, and presumably plans to herd them all onto Israeli airfields eventually, at which point this strat can really pay dividends.


Yeah I like yours. Forgot they tried to make it about some kind of meta-music industry thing. It’s totally about a sex act. I used to joke to my wife that it was about pegging.


Ok I’m with him on that I think. Now what were hall and Oates whining about on “I can’t go for that”?


I was moving thru feed too fast and read headline as “woke power”


According to Ted postel, doctrine requires at least 2x interceptor for each incoming, and the real interception rate is still insanely low. It’s essentially a grift scheme/psychological armor at this point compared to the munitions it has to “defend” against.


That’s close to half a billion dollars of munitions deployed for very minimal results. Wild.


A song of fragmentation warheads and interceptors


Yeah I also laughed out loud when I first read that.


I mean he’s weirdly honest about that sort of thing sometimes:
Williams and Rai joined the president, 80, where Trump described the teen lifeguard as “a real hero.”
“I don’t know if I’d do it,” the president said. “I wouldn’t, probably. You’re lucky I wasn’t on the service that day.”


Yeah true—I liked his breakdown of slower thinker, then faster do-er model setup. I have 3.6 35b on LM studio, but need to look at his optimizations because even with 4090/64gb ram it was pretty slow. Will be a good project ;)


Ah wicked yeah sounded like he would have some instructions. Looking forward to trying it—I’ve tried a bunch of different local models with webui and lately Hermes agent, but have generally beefed up sorta disappointed—either the model is dumb and runs fast, or is somewhat smart but runs so slowly that it’s impossible to work with meaningfully. 24+ but capable sounds like a pretty sweet spot to actually do something with it.


This is an impressive implementation—the key system ram thresholds he identifies are 20ish for good answering, and 40ish for prompt reading. So having 40+ ram might be a stretch for most peoples home systems, but the performance seems pretty good overall regardless.
Gonna have to try and set this up, but expect downloading it to take forever… plus he’s got some weird custom cache stuff going on.


Haha lol


This is awesome


Ahhh took me a sec but I think I know now. Also a synonym for a ghost.
Was gonna say bummer that means they can fix it, but then I remembered: we don’t make anything anymore