It means that it’s Linux shaped as an arch.

Those are different, prefix “arch-” comes from greek “ἀρχι-”, while noun “arch” is from latin “arcus”.

Though, it should be mentioned that initially the meaning was taken from the prefix one, it’s just with time everybody got used to the Arch arch logo and spelling, I suppose.

legitimate

Yea, THC vapes are also illegal in most jurisdictions. People still buy and use them.

there’s some unknowns in the industry, but it’s been around for 20 years now

Yet I know of no studies that would look into health of people who are exclusively vaping across even a 5 year span. It’s not “some unknowns”, we barely know anything about it.

e liquid are all GRAS

This is one of the most wild takes I’ve heard. Something being safe to eat or put on your skin does not mean you can inhale it and expect no harm. One of the most common examples would be benzaldehyde, which is used as a food additive and in vapes, as a gas it causes irritation to respiratory passages.

The worst part is that sometimes you don’t even have to specify a lot of it in the list of ingredients. You can read article 4.2.2.1 of this document, for example.

much safer means of nicotine

And nicotine patches beat both of those by a mile in this regard.

it’s a means of lowering risk

The best way of lowering the risk is using proper, well established methods for quitting smoking before resorting to something like vaping.

You can start with the Wikipedia article. The problematic part here is that we have no long-term studies about vaping and even less studies about people who exclusively vape. There are plenty of studies that indicate that there is a lot of nasty stuff mixed in the aerosol that vapes produce, like this one.

Another thing is that people who are selling these are the same people who sell tobacco and they have decades of experience mudding the research field.

I in general despise vaping as it made a lot of younger people pick up nicotine and it is far more addictive when you are young.

And, well, yes, I am exaggerating with that statement, but the problem is that we don’t know for certain. Substitution therapy exists, but I just can’t support it when whatever you are using is wildly underresearched.

Very happy for you!

Must warn people against trying vapes as a tool to quit smoking, though. It has the same if not worse health risks in addition to much less research about any long-standing effects.

If the standard nicotine patch approach does not work, please consult with a proper doctor.

The ones I got ~15 years ago had installers on them. Makes sense, running a game from a DVD drive would probably result in terrible loading times.

I fixed.

Nah, Kerrigan is the Queen Bitch of the Universe. Only controls bitches.

I absolutely love my bland rectangles with text. Never changed my Waybar theme and I have no rounding on my windows. It’s my 15 corner pixels of screen real estate, go away with your fanciness.

They surely picked it up from somewhere, right? Following the breadcrumbs is usually the only way to get to less known things.

I don’t believe the current paper defines a way to describe “bdsm leaning”, but for “bottoms” you can easily define x, x ∈ H, such that there exists at least one h, h ∈ H, f(h,x) > 0 and no h', h' ∈ H, f(x, h') > 0. If the second condition is not met, conventionally x is regarded to be a “swap”, if the first one is not met, we have a “top”. Hope that helps.

I suppose asking whoever posted it might be a better idea in this case.

Might be a recent original work, where did you get the image?

∪ is for “union”, aka “disjunction for sets”, ∈ is for “includes”, ⊂is for “subset”, don’t confuse ⊂ with ⊆, which also allows for both operands to be the same set.

Difference between ∈ and ⊂ is that former takes an element and a set as operands, latter takes two sets.

Why did you have to point it out? I didn’t even notice until you did!

それもあるけど、最初の方が好きです。

クーラー君！

I must ask you to read the community description, especially if you never read it before.

Systems built on unspoken rules break outside of isolated communities, considering this is very much a global community, I doubt such a system would work in the first place. Would be actually cool to have various degrees of warning tags to then choose on the client side what to unblur automatically and what not to, though.

For me NSFW is something that can get me fired if somebody sees it on my screen during working hours or something that can put the consumer of the content at risk, like gore images making hemophobic people faint. I can see how this image can be a bit disturbing, but I don’t think a piece of leather should be censored, as it dilutes the meaning for the tag too much.

I’d then click on something NSFW thinking there is just another piece of leather with feathers under the tag… I don’t think I need to explain this one.