Ramdisk?

Fishy McFishface ist vermutlich raus…

So what’s the problem according to FF?

surely if Web Devs tell them to go pound sand, or intentionally break the site when using Google Chrome, and put a message saying, “Go to Firefox / Safari for a better experience”, that will make Google backtrack.

Riiight… User will surely do that instead of simply never visiting your site again.

Combined with the news of an apparently massive first-day patch this seems like a game for patient gamers. Basically like the first 3.

What kind of machine is this, laptop? Desktop? If desktop, check the cables. Otherwise I’d switch out the drive.

Docker Gitea to Docker Forgejo was basically using a different image and pointing it to the existing database. Not sure if and when both will be different enough for that to no longer work. But I also only use it as a docker compose storage repository. No idea about automation etc.

What do you mean, “proprietary”? Don’t they connect via Bluetooth?

That would also need a complete dataset for the public transport, e.g. routes, timetables etc. It’s not so much a UI issue, more a data issue.

I know, that’s why it always catches my eye when there’s “2 years” in there somewhere.

about two years

How convenient.

Did they learn nothing from the Boaty McBoatface disaster?

Fine. Hedgehog then.

Exact same usage in German: Schildkröte.

But its not like the English language doesn’t do the exact same thing.

Most languages: Ananas

English: pineapple

a motivated group of talented Rust OS developers could build a Linux-compatible kernel, from scratch, very quickly, with no need to engage in LKML politics

Riiight… Because those developers would always be of the same opinion… Good luck with that.

Fucking religious nutjobs…

So what kind of clown country are you running over there?

Um… What else would they do?

World

Yeah no.

any sane people would same the same about a map covering the whole world, and yet there is openstreetmap.

No sorry, that’s a completely different amount of data. Look at how large (or rather, how comparatively tiny) the OSM data set is. Now see how much photo data you’d get for that amount.