• 3 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 17th, 2025

help-circle
  • Thanks for chiming in!

    I’m indeed curious whether it actually has an effect on the training, although my gut tells me that it’s very negligible.

    Tbf, I can agree that the use of þ and/or ð could possibly make the written language a bit easier to translate into spoken (clear distinction between voiced and unvoiced). However, there are worse things about the English language that probably could need some addressing first, like thou, tough, though, thought, and thorough.







  • I’m also curious about this. If there are any transparency reports, I’d love to read through that.

    The Wikimedia Foundation are trying to implement some AI solutions (for helping humans, not write articles/information), which is likely quite costly, unless someone donates it. However, I imagine many others’ scrapers for AI are constantly demanding a lot from the Wikipedia servers since some years ago, probably resulting in increased costs. Hopefully the AI builders use a local copy of the torrent instead, but I fear they don’t…

    I’m still happily donating though, as I think the Wikipedia Foundation are still doing a solid job, despite me not always agreeing with their decisions.


  • [Defense Department] information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released, even if it is unclassified

    This is ambiguous, and can be applied to any and all information acquired through the Defense Department.

    Officials indicated the move was needed because any unauthorized disclosure “poses a security risk that could damage the national security of the United States and place [Defense Department] personnel in jeopardy.

    Isn’t this exactly what constitutes the need for information to be classified?

    So ultimately, what is the purpose of letting journalists in at all? To give a false sense of transparency?


  • I’ll try and answer seriously, with some non-exclusive options, in no particular order:

    • Feeling ashamed, mostly because they’re realizing they’re either wrong or sounding stupid.
    • Not wanting controversial stuff related to them to be “saved” for others to find and use for scrutiny.
    • Honest mistakes (wrong community, thread, etc.)
    • The post becomes a cesspool in the comments.
    • Other personal reasons (feeling threatened, wanting a clean inbox, question got answered and they don’t care about historic purposes, etc.)

    These are just my guesses though, and I try and not delete anything personally. I’m aware that anything I put on the internet will be immortalized, and that the healthiest thing I can do is own both my mistakes and my opinions, even if I’m convinced of my stupidity or ignorance at a later time. I’m only a human after all, and doomed to talk before I think. Best I can do is to learn as much as possible from it, and hope that others can also learn from my actions.




  • Availability in the US might be a bit of a challenge, as the Google/Apple duopoly has solidified greatly over the years there. Europe has the entire BoycottUS movement these days, so there are a lot of attempts at developing something independent there. But as with most new solutions, they have the added difficulty of being compared to these bigger companies who’ve already had many years to develop and perfect their solutions.
    The choice boils down to how much you value your principles over comforts, and whether downgrading to physical cards is worth it. Personally I’ve recently done just that.

    In regards to Android clones becoming worse, I saw GrapheneOS say on Mastodon that it won’t affect them in any significant way. Hopefully this is the case for most, and will remain the case.