ComradeRat [he/him, they/them]

  • 9 Posts
  • 364 Comments
Joined 6 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 27th, 2020

help-circle

  • In what world is the construction of tower of babel about how people dont need kings and religion is a farce? Babel is Uruk, is Ur, is Babylon—all these are monarchical polities with gods and commodity production. Yankland too is Babel. The collapse of the city of Babel meant the hand of proto-capital was crushed and all its slaves could return free to their land.

    Babel is a story about the ancient near eastern urban city from the view of the nomadic herders at their periphery. This is how it has been interpreted by everyone until the weirdo enlightenment deists made it about human potential.

    As an example of how Babel was understood as sucking, one of the midrash says that at Babel:

    “[The labourers] who took up the bricks at babel went up on the Eastern [ascent], and those who descended went down on the Western [descent]. If a man fell and died, they paid no heed to him, but if a brick fell they sat down and wept, and said: Woe is us! when will another one come in its stead?”




  • Except thats literally not what happened in Russian or chinese revs

    before the fighting started (pre october rev and pre long march) captured comrades were helped to escape and go undergroun and/or into exile. During the civil wars, captured comrades were usually brutally murderes by reactionaries and people were happy if they survived somehow, helped them recover, and sent them.back to work.

    I dont know as much about the internal processes and procedures the cpc followed, but the bolsheviks did full investigations for suspected traitors not just kill on suspicion.

    Cuba’s an even bigger demonstration of how misguided your view is. Even enemy troops were treated well and often recruited! Fidel stressed this “niceness” as the unique element thats made cuba so strong and popular






  • Yeah she’s easy to read too. Very good at making the subject come alive

    To play devils advocate (to attempt to show why its really hard for historians to say for sure one way or the other in cases like these): the archives being sealed could also suggest they dont line up with the official narrative, as well as the other reasons i suggested to electric nan.

    People were scared of him and hated him, but as you say no one’s saying beria’s a nice guy (except perhaps his son): historians’ debate here is entirely over whether or not he was a child molester, not over whether or not he signed off on mass executions and imprisonments


  • Could be yeah, but its equally possible that its locked away bc it proves khrushchev lied, or bc it incriminates some contemporary oligarch’s granddaddy, or even bc no one wanted to spend the time and energy needed to sort it into more or less sensitive info and just slapped “do not open” on the whole thing and called itna day. From what ive read, theres not rly enough evidence available to make more than guesses in the dark


  • So the big issue with scholarship on Beria is he’s one of the least accessible (possibly the single least accessible) bolshevik leader to study.

    According to Sheila Fitzpatrick in the introduction or preface to On Stalin’s Team, when she was allowed access to some of the soviet archives Beria’s were off limits. Khrushchev, Stalin, Lenin, Molotov, Yagoda, Yezhov, etc were accessible, Beria’s was shut. From what she wrote, his archives werent shut to just her, or to westerners, but to literally everyone.

    Fitzpatrick’s introduction also notes that most (all?) of the accusations of Beria postdate Khrushchev’s secret speech, after which Beria was dead and he and Stalin were used as sin-eaters for the rest of the Soviet government.

    She says that bc the archives are shut, what we know of Beria is based pretty much entirely on four groups of sources: 1. pre-1956 official public documents and such (“Comrade Beria is a diligent defender of the USSR”); 2. post-1956 documents (“Beria was a monster and he and Stalin caused every problem”; 3. Beria’s son’s memoirs (“my dad was a decent guy”; and 4. apocryphal stories which are difficult to date or validate (“Stalin was afraid to leave Beria alone with his daughter”). Besides 2 and 4 (and 4 may well largely be derived from 2) these all paint entirely different pictures, and without archive access theres no real way to prove which is closest to reality.

    Fitzpatrick doesnt claim “Beria was innocent” tbc, just notes that there is very little at all that can be said for sure about this question bc of lack of archival access.







  • I cant fit food through my mask so its very awkward (and annoying, and depressing) to sit there while others eat. But unfortunately my org has given up (back in like 22) on covid precautions. So you’ll be happy to know we’re doing our part to infect everyone with covid bc treatlerites cant be bothered to come to shit without material incentives

    That is to say, I agree with your analysis strategy in the modern day; i strongly disagree with your presentation of this as human nature. When I read about the actual old proletarian organisations in 48, 71, or 17, i dont see food mentioned (except as needed to fuel revolutionaries, or as aid to the poor (edit: i.e., as its own event, not a motivator to do political work). Its only among the petty bourgeois and upper classes i see mentions of banquets and social events predominate over education and action as the way to get people out

    Also bold of you to assume we have funding for food; we spend most our money sending execs around the country bc god forbid people have a zoom meeting instead of exchange germs face to face.