• RickRussell_CA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course, how this would actually work:

    Workers: “What do we get?”

    AR: “Well, half of you are fired, the other half keep working just as hard.”

    AR: “What’s with the guillotine?”

    Workers: “We’re acting in our rational self-interest.”

    AR: “I see.”

    AR: “They’re the reason you can’t get a job. If they didn’t form a UNION to keep you OUT, you’d be doing just fine! And I can’t fire THEM, thanks to the UNION.”

    AR: “Well, I’d love to give you more time off, but I can’t, because those MOOCHERS over there are freeloading on the system, and I gotta pay outrageous taxes for their welfare because THEY DON’T WORK.”

    Media: “Let’s talk to two experts in the labor field.”

    Expert 1: “Oh, the problem is definitely abusive, bloated unions and exclusive contracts.”

    Expert 2: “Oh, the problem is definitely freeloading welfare queens.”

    Workers:

    AR: Flies away in her golden private jet, “MUHAHAHAHAHA!”

          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            i don’t know if i’d go that far-- maybe just that she died a sad hypocrite. but it does undermine her credibility quite a bit. i’d say that anyone with even a basic education in economics could totally discredit her, though.

            from what I remember reading, she not only was never really good with money, but she was also a bit out of it in her final years, so her husband was managing her/their finances. he had been receiving and depositing her social security checks for years (and possibly some medicare benefits), but she wasn’t actually aware of it. IIRC, it came out later when he was interviewed about her.