I’ve heavily encouraged people to make heavy use of it to avoid friction on this site.
Just food for thought for anyone who has ever wished to not see a comment from a toxic individual again: there’s literally a button for that!
Thank you for your attention on this matter!


Stop being libs and call it like you see it. Closing our eyes will change nothing.
Liberalism manifests itself in various ways.
Your comment is too good. Get your own post, it deserves better than my shitty meta-post.
You dropped this, comrade.
Clarification: This applies only between party rank-and-file, ie between politically active comrades who are working together. It’s wrong to conceive of this site as a party or even directed toward any actionable goal. Users on this site don’t need to be held to the standards of party members. It is good advice, but no one is obliged to be dragged into online arguments.
that’s what it was originally for, but it doesn’t have to be strictly confined to that. some of them are obviously applicable to just being a good comrade in everyday life and not specific to being in a militant communist organisation. i think there is a lot in there (and across Mao Zedong thought in general) that can and should be applied to everyday life. at least i see it as very valuable personally as someone who doesn’t have much energy for political activity beyond day-to-day agitation. point 1 is a point to live by, not some niche party/military concept.
sorry if this comes across combative or anything i think we are pretty much in agreement!
First, yes we are pretty much in agreement. No worries about any negative feelings.
It is great advice that I, too, try to live by. People are attracted to political work from many backgrounds, with varying interpersonal skills and potentially toxic behavior, not least of which is liberal civility. The advice is useful in daily life for that very reason that it was meant to raise the wisdom of individual party members.
It’s only in the context of party work that mere advice develops into obligation and moral code because, as Mao emphasizes on each point, there are objective harms to organized political work when not followed. And party members are obliged to follow these rules because they have themselves committed to the work. It’s not a standard held to the “masses”, and indeed not every person can or should commit themselves to party work.
Frankly, most people are just trying to survive. I cannot ask anyone to combat liberalism unless they have the capacity to do that.
I think the bigger problem is the habit of holding up the little red book as a Bible. Mao is right here, but he’s not right on the authority of him saying it, and we can get arguments from some of these points but not all of them
Something something book worship
What use does any communist have posting on a site that’s only for venting and does not further the cause of reaching and supporting each other on a revolutionary foundation?
I don’t know about you, but I want to set up every user on this site with a room in an apartment building*, an e-bike, a PC, access to a tool library, a job in a workers’ co-op, and a cool shiny RC copter. And I want to do the same for every network I’m in, not stopping until there are hundreds of thousands of thriving socialists that can live out their dreams.
There doesn’t need to be strict unity (rarely does anything ever need this), but there does need to be meaningful, consequential connection.
*Cob or strawbale construction, 20 m^2 per person, less than 5 km from business districts and also the woods, collective kitchens and composting latrines, rocket mass heaters, and solar panels to cover the remaining 300W per person needs.
This is probably the fifth time I’ve read Combat Liberalism and every time I’m struck by how perfectly Mao distilled the precepts. Evergreen advice. I should probably pin it up on the wall until I stop being such a
it’s one of the texts along with On Contradiction that has most influenced my thinking patterns and actions in my day-to-day life.
It’s beautiful that it fits in a single comment. Brings a tear to the eye every time I see it.
It’s beautiful to think of Mao calling Trotsky the 4th type of Liberal
good post
This user specifically, though, was called out on like a weekly basis, wasting dozens of hours of comrade’s labor trying to help them learn, and invariably each time crashing out and blocking the comrade engaging with them. They got reported many times before this latest crashout.
This is the kind of person that needs to be excised from a community quickly, without wasting effort that could be spent teaching others. Especially online where there are limited stakes and a single person can disproportionately influence the culture of a site by being always online.
We have finite time and there are too many shitheads to carefully explain to the ones that won’t listen. Organize the advanced, educate the intermediate, and isolate the backwards. Sometimes people in the party are backward enough that they need to be purged.