You’re trying to project the moralistic bullshit on your side when you’re the one making ridiculous arguments about how “spiritually devoid” people need punishment for cosmic scales to be balanced. Yeah, there are some people who have been so traumatized by imperialism that they would sign onto that shit, but don’t use the third world as a rhetorical shield for your genocidal misanthropy.
It’s always these fucking parodies of Maoists who act like the wokest, most Marxist thing is for first worlders to either do nothing or just burn everything down and kill everyone rather than ever build something that isn’t a bomb. It’s just school-shooter-level antisociality masquerading as a self-righteous political ideology.
It’s like they’ve internalised the white supremacist idea of the “Race War” or something, just that they think that opposing the white supremacists in it puts them on the “good guy team”, instead of actually rejecting the white supremacist framework and focusing on a material understanding of things.
Do you actually know people from the Global South (diasporan populations living in the imperial core don’t count) or are you just a cracker who has never set foot outside the imperial core?
“Read Settlers” isn’t a fucking argument, and neither is repeating conclusions as dogma. You have no leg to stand on, just some convictions that even if they are correct, would only be correct by coincidence because you refuse to engage with the actual argument.
I didn’t detect any argument from you either, just a bunch of baseless claims about how Americans are apparently spiritually incapable of revolution. If you’re not presenting an argument, why would I bother debunking it?
You sure must be fun at parties
“Revolution is not a dinner party.”
It’s not misanthropic revenge porn either, but I guess some people disagree.
Do you cast moral judgement on the oppressed peoples of the third world for dreaming of revenge?
You’re trying to project the moralistic bullshit on your side when you’re the one making ridiculous arguments about how “spiritually devoid” people need punishment for cosmic scales to be balanced. Yeah, there are some people who have been so traumatized by imperialism that they would sign onto that shit, but don’t use the third world as a rhetorical shield for your genocidal misanthropy.
No, but I’m also not confusing that for an organizational strategy.
It’s always these fucking parodies of Maoists who act like the wokest, most Marxist thing is for first worlders to either do nothing or just burn everything down and kill everyone rather than ever build something that isn’t a bomb. It’s just school-shooter-level antisociality masquerading as a self-righteous political ideology.
And here I was under the impression that collective punishment was bad.
It’s like they’ve internalised the white supremacist idea of the “Race War” or something, just that they think that opposing the white supremacists in it puts them on the “good guy team”, instead of actually rejecting the white supremacist framework and focusing on a material understanding of things.
Very well said.
Do you actually know people from the Global South (diasporan populations living in the imperial core don’t count) or are you just a cracker who has never set foot outside the imperial core?
Saying correct things sarcastically doesn’t mean you’ve rendered them incorrect.
No sarcasm. I’m quoting Mao to highlight the absurdity of bringing up how fun someone is at parties in a conversation like this.
No arguments left, then. Cool.
“Read Settlers” isn’t a fucking argument, and neither is repeating conclusions as dogma. You have no leg to stand on, just some convictions that even if they are correct, would only be correct by coincidence because you refuse to engage with the actual argument.
I didn’t detect any argument from you either, just a bunch of baseless claims about how Americans are apparently spiritually incapable of revolution. If you’re not presenting an argument, why would I bother debunking it?
Why would I need to present a new argument when the only argument anyone like I would ever need has been presented already. Read Settlers.
Recommending a book is not presenting an argument. It’s just admitting you can’t make a point on its own merits. You’re bad at this.