PayPal’s stablecoin, which it debuted in 2023, is supposed to be redeemable at a 1:1 rate for US dollars. $300 trillion is more than double the entire world’s current GDP of $117 trillion. In short, that’s a really bad mistake from Paxos.“

  • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Hurnnnkkkk can you, can you feel it Morty? Can you huurrrrk feel the stability Morty? Soon, thanks to crypto science, we’ll be able to, to exchange all the coins for all the goods and services we want Morty, hnnnk which would have never been possible before bitcoin!

      • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Only if you qualify it as a service worth $300T lol. But really though I don’t think it can even be classified as a transfer payment since the IOU is worthless to the issuer.

        The joke about economists asking each other to eat dogshit does increase GDP if you qualify eating dogshit as a service. It’s why the inclusion of services in GDP is very questionable because of how difficult it is to measure.

        Another example would be healthcare, in the US Healthcare is measured in GDP at price you pay for the final service so you get a bloated GDP. In other countries with universal Healthcare it’s not directly measured and the sector itself is measured at factor cost (wages, equipment etc).

        Yet another one, bank charges eg overdraft fees are included in GDP as a service even though it’s closer to a direct tax than a service.

      • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Only if you qualify it as a service worth $300T lol. But really though I don’t think it can even be classified as a transfer payment since the IOU is worthless to the issuer.

        The joke about economists asking each other to eat dogshit does increase GDP if you qualify eating dogshit as a service. It’s why the inclusion of services in GDP is very questionable because of how difficult it is to measure.

        Another example would be healthcare, in the US Healthcare is measured in GDP at price you pay for the final service so you get a bloated GDP. In other countries with universal Healthcare it’s not directly measured and the sector itself is measured at factor cost (wages, equipment etc).

        Yet another one, bank charges eg overdraft fees are included in GDP as a service even though it’s closer to a direct tax than a service.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    17 days ago

    What in the world is even the point of a coin with 1:1 exchange rate? Just avoiding all the pesky laws? At that point just use the original currency.

    • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s easier to bring across a border as you don’t have anything physical. You don’t have to get along with any bank to transfer it to you on the other side. You can transfer it to whoever’s around where you go. The transfers happen near instantaneously compared to using banking services.