Note: this lemmy post was originally titled MIT Study Finds AI Use Reprograms the Brain, Leading to Cognitive Decline and linked to this article, which I cross-posted from this post in !fuck_ai@lemmy.world.

Someone pointed out that the “Science, Public Health Policy and the Law” website which published this click-bait summary of the MIT study is not a reputable publication deserving of traffic, so, 16 hours after posting it I am editing this post (as well as the two other cross-posts I made of it) to link to MIT’s page about the study instead.

The actual paper is here and was previously posted on !fuck_ai@lemmy.world and other lemmy communities here.

Note that the study with its original title got far less upvotes than the click-bait summary did 🤡

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Anyone who doubts this should ask their parents how many phone numbers they used to remember.

    In a few years there’ll be people who’ve forgotten how to have a conversation.

    • zqps@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t see how that’s any indicator of cognitive decline.

      Also people had notebooks for ages. The reason they remembered phone numbers wasn’t necessity, but that you had to manually dial them every time.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        And now, since you are the father of writing, your affection for it has made you describe its effects as the opposite of what they really are. In fact, [writing] will introduce forgetfulness into the soul of those who learn it: they will not practice using their memory because they will put their trust in writing, which is external and depends on signs that belong to others, instead of trying to remember from the inside, completely on their own. You have not discovered a potion for remembering, but for reminding; you provide your students with the appearance of wisdom, not with its reality. Your invention will enable them to hear many things without being properly taught, and they will imagine that they have come to know much while for the most part they will know nothing. And they will be difficult to get along with, since they will merely appear to be wise instead of really being so.

        —a story told by Socrates, according to his student Plato

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I already have seen a massive decline personally and observationally (watching other people) in conversation skills.

      Most people now to talk to each other like they are exchanging internet comments. They don’t ask questions, they don’t really engage… they just exchange declaratory sentences. Heck most of the dates I went on the past few years… zero real conversation and just vague exchanges of opinion and commentary. A couple of them went full on streamer, like just ranting at me and randomly stopping to ask me nonsense questions.

      Most of our new employees the past year or two really struggle with any verbal communication and if you approach them physically to converse about something they emailed about they look massively uncomfortable and don’t really know how to think on their feet.

      Before the pandemic I used to actually converse with people and learn from them. Now everyone I meet feels like interacting with a highlight reel. What I don’t understand is why people are choosing this and then complaining about it.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The other day I saw someone ask ChatGPT how long it would take to perform 1.5 million instances of a given task, if each instance took one minute. Mfs cannot even divide 1.5 million minutes by 60 to get get 25,000 hours, then by 24 to get 1,041 days. Pretty soon these people will be incapable of writing a full sentence without ChatGPT’s input

      Edit to add: divide by 365.25 to get 2.85 years. Anyone who can tell me how many months that is without asking an LLM gets a free cookie emoji

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Rough estimate using 30 days as average month would be ~35 months (1050 = 35×30). The average month is a tad longer than 30 days, but I don’t know exactly how much. Without a calculator, I’d guess the total result is closer to 34.5. Just using my own brain, this is as far as I get.

        Now, adding a calculator to my toolset, the average month is 365.2425 d / 12 m = 30.4377 d/m. The total result comes out to about 34.2, so I overestimated a little.

        Also, the total time is 1041.66… which would be more correctly rounded to 1042, but has negligible impact on the redult.

        Edit: I saw someone else went even harder on this, but for early morning performance, I’m satisfied with my work

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          🍪

          Pirat gave me an egg emoji, so I baked some more cupcake emojis. Have one for getting it so close without even using a calculator 🧁

      • pirat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I want a free cookie emoji!

        I didn’t ask an LLM, no, I asked Wikipedia:

        The mean month-length in the Gregorian calendar is 30.436875 days.

        Edit: but since I already knew a year is 365.2425 I could, of course, have divided that by the 12 months of a year to get that number.

        So,

        1041 ÷ 30.436875 ≈ 34 months and…

        0.2019343313 × 30.436875 ≈ 6 days and…

        0.146249999987 × 24 ≈ 3 hours and…

        0.509999999688 × 60 ≈ 30 minutes and…

        0.59999998128 × 60 ≈ 35 seconds and…

        0.9999988768 × 1000 ≈ 999 milliseconds and

        0.9999988768 × 1000000 ≈ 999999 nanoseconds

        34 months + 6d 3h 30m 35s 999ms 999999 ns (or we could call it 36s…)

        Edit: 34 months is better known as 2 years and 10 months.

          • pirat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Thank you, you really didn’t have to. That cupcake is truly the icing and it’s almost too much! I’ll give you this giant egg of unknown origin: 🥚 in return, as long as you promise to use it for baking and making some more of those cupcakes for whoever else needs or deserves one within the next few days, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds and 999999 bananoseconds 🍌

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      People don’t memorize phone numbers anymore? Why not? Dialing is so much quicker than searching your contacts for the right person.

      • UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is the furthest thing from my experience lol I can type 2 letters in my phone, see the right name and press call. I haven’t memorised a phone number since before the year 2000* (*hyperbole)