“Kids These Days”

Written by: Gaia Violo

Directed by: Alex Kurtzman

“Beta Test”

Written by: Noga Landau & Jane Maggs

Directed by: Alex Kurtzman

We’re back! Sorry for the inconvenience, and thank you for your patience!!

  • wirehead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Just watched Ep 1.

    Star Trek (and science fiction) exists as a mirror of it’s time, different enough so that we can look at ourselves from a distance, with a required added component of playing with the ideas about what the future might be like. TOS and TNG were both mirrors of their time, with a Klingon on the bridge predicting the end of the cold war.

    I definitely feel the “ok, the present generation of kids is inheriting a shitshow” vibes to this show. If you understand that there were a bunch of past efforts to do the Burn in Star Trek, it seemed like something that floated around for a long time now to break the universe (the abortive Star Trek: Final Frontier animated series being one) and … I dono, I’m more OK with it now than I would have been in 2009 because, as I said, Trek is a mirror of it’s time.

    Comparing things to Star Wars, the sequel trilogy started out with the idea of “Guess what, fighting nazis again!” and it was prescient and it’s altogether too bad that they hadn’t actually thought things through well enough to bring it to a really smashing conclusion. There are a lot of threads (Caleb’s mom being a big one) where they could totally bungle things.

    So, we start with family separation. Wonder where that came from! And then we kinda bounce around the subject, too. Nahla having done a thing, regretted it, leaving Starfleet, trying to make it better while also showing that whatever they do end up doing, it’s not “solving” what they did in the first place.

    Nus Braka chews up the scenery. This is important, in a Trek series. Yes, it can be quiet and thoughtful and serious but we always come back to the spectacularly overplayed antagonist.

    I’m fairly OK with NuTrek trusting the audience less and driving a point home harder. A lot of people ascribe old Trek with values that it never had and part of that’s because the writers trusted the audience to see the point, but folks just don’t have the same attention span to do that anymore.

    Very very nerdy side note: on Outpost Pikaru there’s a whole set of grating panels that I assume are a deliberate callback to the freezer spacing grates that were all over the TNG-era Trek serieses as well as a bunch of other science fiction properties. They look very very similar but they aren’t.

    On the reddit side of the fence, someone suggested you look up Gina Yashere’s standup to realize just how Lura Thok is basically Gina playing herself but in the 31st century. She reminds me of one of the assistant principals at my high school, actually, except she’s got more drill sergeant edge to her.

    Jay-Den Kraag… when I was but a wee little trekkie, I knew a trans person who was deep into hardcore Klingon fandom and I think part of why it made sense for him was that Klingons was part of how he settled into his new gender? So the idea of Klingon males as a mirror to masculinity … toxic and otherwise … has been a thing, at least for me, for a while. I feel like Jay-Den Kraag was someone looking at the Klingon Therapist meme and making an actual character out of it. The entire scene where the Klingon is de-escalating things between two cocky assholes is something at least I needed.

    SAM’s first few scenes I skipped past the first watching and then when her character made sense, I had to go back and actually watch them because they were a lot less cringe.

    Genesis is an interesting version of charming because at first glance she starts out as a “mean girl” but then you realize that she’s parodying it hard.

    Okay, and the Doctor back as the anchor to the very past. Robert Picardo is keeping the Picard name alive in that he kinda aged to a certain age and he hasn’t really aged much since, much in the same way as Patrick Stewart does.

    There’s lots of fanservice, but in a good way. The half-white/half-black species from TOS, a green Orion, the Doctor, etc.

    One thing that’s interesting with the characters who don’t stay locked up in the dorms when the big action is happening is that they all have plausible reasons to be there. Caleb has been living a life on the run for a long time now. Jay-Dem is a Klingon and shows some moments of self-doubt. Genesis has been living on starbases her whole life, shades of Beckett Mariner actually. Darem is cocky and it gets him in trouble. And then SAM, doesn’t know better, but also doesn’t know fear in the way a biological would. Meanwhile, one of the other cadets is screaming senselessly.

    And I guess back to Nahla … she goes from “just following orders” to “Bajor schoolteacher on ice cream day” to supportive nurturing captain to playing high stakes poker with a space pirate and back. And she’s small, except for the part where she’s able to exude authority when being towered over. They were asking her to sell a lot and I think she did it. I looked through her IMDB and my past experience of her was the mom from Thirteen and Elastigirl.

    One thing I hope, as a long standing Ex Astris Scientia reader, is that there’s … some sort of sense to the programmable matter, the wild 31st century designs, et al. TNG had a lot of particle-of-the-week stuff but Voyager was a crazy-quilt of nonsense particles. It’s important for the viewer to, albeit not from the first episode or two, gain some vibes for where the boundaries are, otherwise there’s no stakes. A transporter ruins basically any “locked room” detective novel puzzle.

    Likewise, how they wrap up Caleb and his mom is going to either make or break the emotional arc of the series?

    So, overall … it landed with me, based on where I am in my life. I empathized with Nahla in a bunch of ways that make me angry about the world I empathized with Jay-Den in a bunch of ways that made me content about the world. I’m not sure how the younger generation or casual Trek fans are going to react to it.

    Edit: Unspoilered because the mods told me I didn’t need to.

    • James R Kirk@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’m fairly OK with NuTrek trusting the audience less and driving a point home harder

      I’m generally against this, but it’s also not like Star Trek ever gave us a reasonable expectation of subtlety…

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Re: limits of programmable matter:

      On Discovery away teams wore programmable matter flashlight bracelets that could turn into a phaser, and I think even a phase rifle, but from these last couple of episodes it seems they can’t make a tricorder that turn into a medical tricorder.

      • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        I really hope they get into this at some point, but my assumption is that the main limitation of programmable matter is that you have to, y’know, program it first, which takes time.

        Also, I had no idea that programmable matter is an actual theoretical thing that scientist have been trying to crack for a few decades now!

        In the case of the tricorder…I wonder if that’s the Doctor being old-fashioned, since we’ve also seen that tricom badges have tricorders built into them.

        • ryper@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          The away team braclets are programmed for at least a couple of different modes, and switching is pretty quick. I would think if they could use programmable matter to make a multi-mode tricoder, it would be standard.

          At any rate, I assume they can’t program matter into dilithium, because that would have made recovering from the Burn a whole lot easier.

  • thetrekkersparky@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I had some concerns going in, but enjoyed them a lot more than I expected. Good to see some familiar faces, especially Vance as he was one of the better Disco s3 additions.

  • HyperCube@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Going into it I wasn’t sure about a school-based Star Trek, but I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed the first two episodes. It helps that the characters are a little older than I thought they were going to be (university instead of high school), but there was also some enjoyable writing in there that kept me interested and made me laugh a few times. Shout out to SAM, I was concerned at first because these fish-out-of-water characters are easy to make annoying but I ended up quite liking her.

    I did have a few issues (I still don’t love the burn as a plot device), but overall I’m interested to see what happens in the next episode.

    Also, yay Prodigy references!

  • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    So far I’ve just watched episode one, but I think we’re off to a great start. I don’t know Holly Hunter from anything except Batman v Superman, so I didn’t know why everyone seemed so happy to have her on board, but I get it now. Nahla isn’t much on paper, but Hunter really makes me love the character. She sells the comfort and confidence without feeling at all silly or non-genuine.

    I thought Caleb would be a harder character to like, but he won me over pretty quickly too. His introduction definitely started on the right foot. His mode of escape reminded me of Jason Todd stealing the tires off the Batmobile. Good stuff.

    The other cadets are a mixed bag so far. Jay-Den and Sam seem fun, the others seems like boring cliches, but none of them have been given a lot of time yet so it’s still a wait and see situation.

    The episode itself was a little messy, especially the action at the end, but I get that it was the first episode and they felt they had to give everyone something to do. Still one of Trek’s better premiers.

  • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Is anyone else concerned that they might making the same decision they did with Discovery and making the series into “Star Trek: Caleb Mir”? At this point, everyone else already feel like background singers to me.

  • Schal330@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I thought the overall story has an interesting concept, with some cheesy writing in some bits, and some comedy littered in so they aren’t taking themselves too seriously. Something that bothered me was the use of a current day wheelchair…

    Federation cadet in a current day wheelchair

    This is set 1000+ years in the future where they can solve people being blind but you’re telling me they can’t even have an professor-X style floating chair at a minimum?!

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I thought about this back when they had the wheelchair-using crewman in the first couple of seasons of Discovery - I think I’ve come down on the side of “sometimes the old ways are the best ways” with stuff like this.

      You can’t suddenly lose power and crash your wheeled chair. For all we know, it’s got some sort of powered unit for use when the user encounters a steep incline or flight of stairs or whatever.

      But for everyday use? Yeah, I’ll stick with wheels.

  • Stormygeddon@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Protostar mentioned! A little too much Shakey Cam. A little too much swearing. Cuss words still feel weird in Star Trek. Sound mixing in the Xenomythology scene of Episode 2 felt off. So, did they forgo green makeup for some of the Orions(?) because it’s hard to apply? Some of those looked digitally colored. Apparently, they heavily considered making Gamora blue instead of green because of such problems with application, so I don’t blame them. Episode 2 got real cheesy near the end. I’m glad to see a love for what seems to be all of trek, with cameos of species like Brikar from Prodigy, the Exocomp, old style Klingons, DS9, and so on. Overall though, it just seems like the priorities are skewed and much of it looks kind of cheap.

  • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    So far I have only watched episode one. First impression: God, why does everything have to be a dystopian nightmare with these people? Second impression: mediocre plot, mostly uninteresting characters, full of Kurtzman-isms. Gotta give it a chance though.

  • showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Welcome back! I enjoyed both these episodes. I don’t like this time period, the post burn Federation. The rebuilding could interesting but it’s not really aspirational and I really could use some aspirational content in my life, vaguely waves at every thing.

    • skfsh@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Rebuilding in the wake of global disaster (and honestly it’s been one after another my whole life) is exactly the kind of inspirational content I think we need right now. 90s Trek was all about “things have been great, it could be better!” and I think our message today really should be “things have sucked for a bit, but how do we recover the greatness we know we’re capable of?”

      • showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        I hadn’t really seen that point of view before but I really like it. Shit has sucked for a while maybe some stories about how cool fixing it would be are what I need.

      • Routhinator@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        This, very well put. I’ve been struggling to vocalise why I like this to folks and I think you nailed it.

        Its a different message for a different era. And one we need. Too many are looking at the near and potentially bleak future, we need them to realise that hope can still lay beyond that.

        • Snowcano@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Totally! I haven’t loved the post-Burn setting but the way this show is already contextualizing it, and the optimism it’s doing it with is already starting to change my mind.

          And it’s even carrying over from the show into real life, which is one of the things I love most about Trek and its good to have this out there. There’s some nitpicks, as there always are, but so far I can deal with them, especially if it stays consistent. 🖖

          • Corgana@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            I haven’t loved the post-Burn setting but the way this show is already contextualizing it, and the optimism it’s doing it with is already starting to change my mind.

            Same. A lot of that stuff just feels more comfortable with time and I appreciate how Star Trek always pushes it a little bit. People FREAKED OUT with the Klingon changes in TMP/TNG. Then FREAKED OUT that DS9 was on a space station with a “politically correct” captain. Now we think of those things as normal, nostalgic even.

            • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              Yeah, this. Sci-fi fanbases and especially Trek/Wars fans are constantly flipping out when their sci-fi is socially progressive at all, even if it started that way.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I liked it too, but I find rebuilding to be aspirational. Like maybe the most aspirational thing possible.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    There was many a memberberry.

    At one point I thought that it didn’t look very Trek-y, somehow. Which can be explained of course by the fact that an entire millennium of progress has happened. It should be more surprising that anything does still look familiar. The thing is though that I watch Star Trek for the Trek-iness. The visual familiarity is part of it. I don’t know yet.

    Let’s hope episode 3 starts being about more than Caleb’s mum. And science.

    At least there was some diplomacy. Although it was weird that they’d negotiate while standing at lecterns surrounded by hundreds of people. Sit down, have a cuppa together, have a conversation, not a debate.

    Also, I’m supposed to ship Caleb and his roommate whose name I have forgotten, yes? The way they interact is textbook shipping material. Not to mention They Are Roommates.

        • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          As an animated Trek fan, that definitely irks, especially as it’s an animated sequence.

          I have a suspicion that there’s something about animated design IP rights behind the decision though.

          The old owners had decided to jettison animated Star Trek, and some other Paramount+ animated content to make the streamer mainly live action focused. Which, at the time this was announced, seemed very odd because Paramount’s owners were trying to sell the firm to Skydance, which is a major producer of high end animation for streamers.

          So, my thought is that Skydance wants its own animation studio to be doing any future animated content for Paramount. There will be exceptions for long running Nickelodeon animation such as SpongeBob, Beavis and Butthead or Dora the Explorer, but relatively recent creations will get short shrift.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            You sound like you know what you’re talking about while I know very little if anything - how does that IP rights stuff mean that the Cerritos and the Protostar can’t be in that sequence?

            • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              Generally, Paramount owns all Star Trek IP rights.

              However, reusing some things isn’t cost less. In some cases, they have to pay residuals to specific individuals or subcontractors who have creative rights.

              Historically, this has led to weirdness such as renaming the Locarno character from the TNG episode ’Lower Decks’, played by Robert Duncan McNeill, to become Tom Paris in Voyager because Paramount didn’t want to pay the writer who got scrip credit for the TNG episode ongoing residuals for creating the character.

              I don’t know enough about whether creators of animated character designs have rights to similar kinds of residuals, or the production houses like Titmouse for Lower Decks, but one has to wonder. It was so strange that Paramount+ suddenly said it was refocusing away from animation just as Skydance started its moves to acquire it.

    • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I felt better once they got out the prisons; the ship aesthetics have some generic sci-fi aesthetic to them, but having the reds in them makes it feel overall much brighter and Trek-y. Honestly, even though it’s not as bright as TNG, just being able to actually see scenes was nice.

  • Routhinator@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    This show is one part Lower Decks, one part Prodigy, one part Discovery, and a dash of SNW… I dig it. Excited to see where it goes.

  • observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Episode 1: with expectations at the bottom of the Mariana Trench (because I watched Discovery), I was not too disappointed by this episode. Was it good? Also no. I think the story is fine in principle, it doesn’t unfold in a believable way, but not the worst we’ve seen in Star Trek. Other than that I was irked by what the captain says at 41:55:

    make eh(?) your speed maximum impolt

    Really, impolt, you couldn’t do a second take on that?

    Episode 2: quite a bit worse, the plot progressed for like 3 minutes in total, and there was a lot of that teen drama that wasn’t interesting or amusing.

    Overall felt like these were written by people who know a lot about Star Trek at a very surface level, and have a very TV-idea of what college life is like. I’ll keep watching, for now. Out of franchise loyalty more than actual interest.

    • Odo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      There were several lines in both episodes that I felt needed another take. Besides a few awkward pronunciations, I lost track of how many lines had strange pacing or weirdly-placed pauses in the middle of sentences.

  • haverholm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I enjoyed these more than I thought I would! Most of my own thoughts after watching have been broached here already, but there was one thing that interested me in SAM’s interactions with the EMH Doctor:

    Didn’t he seem visibly shaken when asked about the Protostar crew, like he knew something SAM didn’t? I don’t recall the conversation exactly, but could this be a backdoor to giving the Prodigy storyline some closure down the line on Academy?

    I’m theorising in part because after “Those old scientists” I could definitely imagine a similar animation-to-live-action crossover. We already had a Brikar walking around on campus, and I’m fairly sure Ella Purnell could pull off Gwyn on camera 🙂

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Didn’t he seem visibly shaken when asked about the Protostar crew, like he knew something SAM didn’t?

      I didn’t think that at the time, but on rewatch…maybe? At least some of the Prodigy kids are on the memorial wall, but that doesn’t really mean much in context. I’m not sure how the production timelines of the two series aligned when this pilot would have been filming, but they may even have been attempting to do a little synergy.