Transition from: Designed for Cars to Designed for People, Cars, and Bikes

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 days ago

      Exactly! The design forces everyone to drive more slowly and deliberately. If I was a driver I would be very pleased. The only people that hate this are speeders.

      • Demdaru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        I dunno. Paths are clearer and easier to predict, lanes are more defined. In good circumstances, you can safely speed more than before. Not that it’s good idea, but it literally doesn’t take away anything from drives while massively improving safety, clarity and elegance.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 days ago

          When paths are narrow and the sidewalks busy (people, trees, benches, etc) drivers subconsciously slow down because it feels faster. Inversely, drivers speed up in wide open areas because it feels slower. This has been well studied and rebutted earlier urban design principles that thought narrow streets and obstacles caused traffic accidents.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 days ago

      That’s one of the recurring ironies. Most of the stuff anti-car-culture people are pushing for (eg: more trains, this photo, etc) make it better for the people who do drive

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    But fuck this shit:

    I want my zebra back, this is not visible from far away. And if I don’t see a crosswalk anywhere nearby, then I shall cross the road anywhere convenient.

    This I like:

    • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Bratislava’s barely visible pedestrian crossings also tripped me the fuck out when I was there but then I realized you can actually cross wherever it’s convenient because drivers are not out to kill you.

    • topherclay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Are there images in your comment that other people are seeing? I don’t see anything after your : characters except a few lines of white space.

      • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        Yeah. But Imgur blocks me because of my VPN, so I used Catbox. However Catbox is blocked in some countries.

        ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

        Edit: From FAQ, blocked in/on/by: Australia, Ireland, UK, Iran, Afghanistan, Comcast, Spectrum, Rogers, Verizon, Quad9.

        • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          I can access catbox from the UK, no VPN. But videos hosted on it often won’t show up on Connect(although they did until recently), so I have to view them via browser. I can see your images just fine.

  • ValiantDust@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 days ago

    It’s very good, but it would have been even better if they didn’t do the “you’re on your own now” thing with the bike lane.

    • FundMECFS@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      For sure. Or added the crossing where you have to wait for lights. It’s a small road, it should just be a crosswalk with pedestrian priority and a low speed limit. Not a car priority traffic light crossing.

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        If there’s not very much car traffic and almost no trucks, and if that traffic obeys the rules and speed limits well enough, there is not always the need for separate bike lane. This way the bicycles, if there are many cyclists, become an indication to car drivers that what they are driving on is a local street, woonerf, school area, etc. While the design with separated bike lane would be a 1 person wide situation, while this way cyclists can cycle 2 next to eachother together in the street which is a lot more fun. I don’t know this particular street or city, if it works depends on local factors such as general driver culture, habits, local policing efforts, amount of cyclists, etc, but it’s not per definition the worse design.

        What I dislike is that they did put in the bike lane for the silly short piece. In this case, it could’ve been better to just raise the entire intersection in a speedbump-plateau and no separate bike lane at all.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      One solution would be to sacrifice the new gardens on that top road to make space for bike lanes. Of even better, the whole road becomes a bike-first road where cars are allowed in at 10km/h.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    Nice. Looks like not one tree was felled, too.

    But we need to address these port-a-potties. What sadist would put them right under someone’s window? They have an exhaust pipe at the top!

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    This is why good infrastructure that is people focused is a win for everyone.

    Everyone wins here including drivers with clear roadways and proper clear rules/signage.