• TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Are those supposed to be twin lamps? I can’t make out what the left picture is at all.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Ah ok. I’m guessing the trees are after the lamps? Are they on the elf island?

        I know the creation stuff, but not that much after it.

        • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah. I’m not sure why, from a narrative perspective, Tolkien choose to have Melkor destroy the world’s source of light (the lamps) and then have Melkor destroy the world’s source of light (the trees this time) again. I think it’s already clear that he’s the Dark Lord after the first time he does it, but maybe there’s some additional symbolism that I missed.

          • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            What is destroyed can be brought back but not in the same way. Destruction is not the end even though things won’t be the same after, probably a world wars reference of sorts.

            • BearGun@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Not everything needs to have deep/real-world meaning. As i recall, Tolkien really didn’t like people ascribing such things to his writing. They’re just stories and should be treated as such.

              • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                That’s true but stories come from somewhere and people are allowed their own interpretations (within reason). Once something is out in the world you can’t control how other people perceive it.

                • BearGun@ttrpg.network
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  Absolutely, but calling it a reference implies that it was intentional by the writer, which seems unlikely considering what he’s said about such things.