- cross-posted to:
- urbanism@slrpnk.net
- cross-posted to:
- urbanism@slrpnk.net
You must log in or register to comment.
Weirdly, the abstract on the original paper is a bit clearer than the linked text:
Among children who took inactive modes at baseline, 42% of children in London and 20% of children in Luton switched to active modes. For children taking active modes at baseline, 5% of children in London and 21% of children in Luton switched to inactive modes.
Why is this a surprise to anyone?