Hi, Once in a while I try to clean up my tabs. First thing I do is use “merge all windows” to put all tabs into one window.

This often causes a memory clog and firefox get stuck in this state for 10-20 minutes

I have recorded one such instance.

I have tried using the “discard all tabs” addon, unfortunately, it is also getting frozen by the memory clog.

Sometimes I will just reboot my PC as that is faster.

Unfortunately, killing firefox this way, does not save the new tab order, so when I start firefox again, it will have 20+ windows open, which I again, merge all pages and then it clogs again !

So far the only solution I have found is just wait the 20 minutes.

Once the “memory clog” is passed, it runs just fine.

I would like better control over tab discard. and maybe some way of limitting bloat. For instance, I would rather keep a lower number of undiscarded youtube that as they seem to be insanely bloated.

In other cases, for most website I would like to never discard the contents.

In my ideal world, I would like the tabs to get frozen and saved to disk permanently, rather than assuming discard tabs can be reloaded. As if the websites were going to exist forever and discarding a tab is like cleaning a cache.

  • 0oWow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re not likely going to get any real help since you’re insisting on using the browser in an extreme and unconventional way. Your little world is just one browser/OS crash from losing all of those tabs.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      What is amazing to me is how some people will come out of the woodwork to tell a person when they think they’re using their browser “wrong”. Just let them be if you have nothing to contribute.

      • jwt@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If someone is trying to achieve a goal through (what they might not know are) impossible means, “letting them be” isn’t going to help them.

        Although it might not seem very helpful (and indeed there are better ways of helping) pointing out the flaws in the approach is contributing more than “letting them be”. Doesn’t cost a thing to be civil about it though.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          What OP is trying to do isn’t impossible it’s actually very interesting. There are lots of people who use tab workflows instead of bookmarks. And I think everybody would benefit from better in-browser search. Just because bookmarks is how it was done 30 years ago doesn’t mean we can’t try new things.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you need quick access to this many pages I suggest organizing bookmarks. As this is what they are meant for. Tabs are meant for active pages you are working with. So anytime you get that many tabs with any browser its gonna run like shit.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      I find organizing bookmarks incredibly tedious. I have bookmarks folder with thousands of tabs in and it’s just easier to use google again to re-find the information than to pick them out of bookmarks. Also tabs just keep the title and URL so you can’t even search the text inside. So, organizing a library of tabs is like a much worse version of google without previews. I also use the session manager addon but again, when you open thousands of tabs, it clogs up the memory almost instantly. It’s taking multiple gigabytes of ram, just to display a few kilobytes of text ! I wish the browser would just render the page as a static searchable text and image and then ditch all the javascript garbage.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    The solution is to see a psychotherapist because dude is there something strange happening in your brain and it really needs fixing.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think the machine built to handle hundreds of trillions of operation per second should be better at handling a few gigabytes of text and images.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Fuck, you’re welcome to create your own web browser if it’s that easy.

        Oh sorry, i forgot you have a lot of shit going on.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, it’s a disease called “having a lot of shit going on and not wanted to spend my afternoon sorting tabs” It is cured by “throwing all tabs in the bin and starting over” because today’s computer are so incredibly weak they can’t handle a few megabytes of text anymore.

      • Lee Duna@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        because today’s computer are so incredibly weak they can’t handle a few megabytes of text anymore.

        I mean, sites today are more richer compared to earlier 2000s. We have css, more complex js scripts, embedded fonts, embedded videos etc. I’m sure you understand that it takes more than a few megabytes of RAM.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Okay I know people are being rude. You have to understand its not just text. Your browser sends a request to a server for a webpage and it downloads that webpage, all media included. Its not just text. The only solution here is disabling all of your addons and going one by one until the merge all works. Or finding a work flow that doesn’t involve the goal of reaching 20k tabs. Browser are not designed to search through tabs. Firefox has bookmark tags and keywords to search or instantly open a link. But tabs are not meant to be this repository of where you’ve been.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          I mean, look at how much data a youtube tab actually download, versus how much it occupies in memory. I think the strict memory isolation between tabs, so that one tab crash doesn’t take down the entire browser, has become uneconomical. I think combining some tab memory. Especially tabs of the same websites, especially their libraries, would greatly reduce the memory consumption and probably overall speed. I rarely ever get crashes until I bust both my ram and swap. I would sacrifice some tab isolation to get some memory back.

  • chillhelm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not going to tell you that you’re managing your information wrong. I would physically die if I had ever more than 20 tabs (my ADHD couldn’t handle it).

    But I think you might be using the wrong tool. A browser (like Firefox) is not really designed as an information manager. It’s primary purpose is navigating and visualizing web pages. So when you talk about “a few megabytes of text and images” thats not what your browser sees. Your browser handles more than just the text and images. It also handles fetching and prefetching, a browser history for every tab, a JS context and much much more.

    What you want is some kind of personalized archiving system that processes websites into machine processable (ie searchable) structures. Firefox is not that. Maybe data hoarder communities will have the answers you seek.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well so far, it would be too much friction and extra labour to export each tab to external software.

      I’m not even sure what software other than a browser would display live web pages in a more organized manner than firefox ?

      I’m pretty sure I just hit a bug that’s causing firefox to wake up too many tabs and not handle tab discarding correctly. Firefox does seem like the best tool still even if it’s not working right.

      What I would like instead is a browser that treats tabs more like virtual machines that you can roll back, suspend to disk and resume. Little package of data that get frozen in time and are externally searchable.

      Anyway, here’s my setup

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    geez, just press Ctrl+W when you’re done with a tab, or if the tab is older than a couple hours

    I don’t understand why some are so attached to tabs. Search your history if you need it again.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      I tried closing tabs, I have to finish reading them, make sure I got everything and that whatever reason I had for opening that tab was done. The result is that I spend all most all my time trying to close and sort and order tabs instead of doing what I was trying to do in the first place. And then the browser freezes for 10 minutes.

      Something is very wrong that 64GB is nowhere near enough to handle a few megabytes of text. And searching text inside of all tabs is an unthinkably difficult operation ?

      Where did the web go wrong !?

      • settoloki@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not the web it’s you dude. You’re not using the software the way it’s intended to be used. There is no reason at all to ever need 1000+ tabs open.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not the web. It seems to me you might have an attention deficit issue. Try improving your workflow.

          • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            3 months ago

            Then invent the technology that makes what you want to do reasonable, otherwise don’t blame a drill for being incapable of hammering nails fast enough for you.

          • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            Say these problems are fixed for now. How many tabs is enough? How do you see this tab hoarding progression being sustainable at all?

            • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              3 months ago

              I would put the full text, image and video of every tab I have ever opened into the context memory of an open source LLM if I could. I would only consciously delete stuff that needs to stop existing immediately, like doxxing data or illegal data or malicious code.

              This is like asking, how many email should you keep.

              Well at work we auto delete all emails after 60 days.

              But my personal email has every email going back to 2006, the last storage failure before backup, and it’s all quickly searchable.

              The other limit would be storage space, but my cluster has still 180 terabyte empty space, I don’t see that getting filled up from plain browser data any time soon.

              Of course, I would like better automated data catalogging tools. I would like to ask my local open source LLM to “pull up all tabs regarding 7 megahertz maser project” and it should should open a browser window that contains every tab I have ever come accross on that topic. Including now-dead websites. It should all be sorted by date, it should know to put the more basic tabs to the left and the cutting edge stuff on the right. All this without me tagging a single thing, without wasting a minute of my time doing sorting busywork.

              It is the job of the computer to organize my data, in an offline, private, reliable, open source-based, enshittification-proof manner with infinite memory and perfect recall. So that I can get on with doing the stuff that I want to do and not fiddle with browser settings.

              Mozilla foundation has revenues in the 500 million range and a 7 million a year CEO, I expect nothing less.

              I applaud their initiative with llamafile, however I hope that was just an appetizer.

              • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                yeah mate - you need a knowledge management software, not a browser.

                tabs were always ephemeral and that’s unlikely to change because they’re much more than text and images.

                that’s simply an unreasonable expectation for a browser.

                I’m honestly surprised Firefox even handles more than a few hundred open tabs.

              • subtext@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                That’s fair, maybe you’re using the wrong tool though, something like an internet archive sounds more like what you need.

                Take every tab you open and save a PDF, all the text, and all the images, then put a timestamp on them before deleting the tab. That’s not the point of a browser though, that’s an entirely different product.

                You’re welcome to build it though, or ask Microsoft if they can make Recall work for tabs.

  • ArcticAmphibian@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    A tab suspender extension might help some, but there’s only so much you can do to minimize the impact of thousand(s) of tabs. Cleaning out old tabs more frequently is probably a better habit.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I tried a tab suspender, but it would replace tabs with a moz:// address that would end up breaking all my tabs when I copy & pasted them from a text file. Also tab suspender doesn’t work once firefox gets into that state. I think the internal scheduler is trying to load tabs and discarding them as fast as possible. What I need is a big “stop button” that stop it all from at least trying to load new tabs.

      I think what’s happenning is when I merge all windows, many gets get woken up and, like the youtube tabs they seem to gobble up 2 to 4 gb of ram while initializing to that freezes everything.

      It’s making it really hard to get to 10k 20k tabs when it really falls apart like that with not even 2k tabs.

      This makes the browser experience really bogged down where most of the time is spent finishing and closing tabs instead of just getting on with the actual task.

      I would really like to spend less time fiddling with my browser and it “just working”.

      • ArcticAmphibian@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        20k tabs? I struggle to see how someone could go through that many tabs, even over a long period of time. Your workflow is something the browser was never made to handle.

        Try some popular non-Mozilla tab suspend extensions. I doubt that they all operate the same way.

          • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, my computer sucks, I need 256GB ram and 128 cpu cores apparently

            Although even then it still would be too weak to do something crazy like search for text, in all tabs

              • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                It works fine, until I run “merge all windows” then many of them appear to be waken up. You are right, maybe one of my addon is causing them to wake up unnecessarily. But I have so many, it’s hard to tell which one it might be.

                • Mina@berlin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  @interdimensionalmeme

                  That seems like a reasonable theory.

                  I once had an add on (don’t remember which, something with videos, I think), which slowed everything down.

                  I found it by disabling add-ons one by one.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          The thing is that, it does work fine as long as I don’t disturb too many tabs. It’s the action of agglomerating all tabs to a single window that wakes up a bunch of tabs unnecessarily Surely there’s a shortcut or something to “stop all tabs” immediately. I would even take a “discard all tabs” to flush the tab memory. It seems to be what happens after a while, but it takes more than 5 minutes to happen on its own.

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve read this entire thread like three times and watched all the videos you’ve posted, and I still don’t understand your workflow at all.

    If searching bookmarks/history is harder than using Google to just find the thing you want to get back to, why do you need to keep the things you want to get back to open rather than just using Google to find the page again later? Or when you want to get back to something you (think you?) have left open, do you find it just by scrolling through all your tabs until a title/favicon looks like what you’re looking for?

    Your last paragraph makes it seem like maybe you want to keep the tabs open so if the page/content gets deleted off of the server, you don’t lose it. Is that correct? I’d imagine that doesn’t always accomplish that, though, right? (Particularly for something like YouTube.) If that’s a significant part of why you keep the tabs open, though, maybe that bit at least is a good question for a data hoarder community.

    I haven’t been able to find any “discard all tabs” addon for Firefox by Googling. And I can’t guess what exactly it does. (Does it save tab states to disk and suspend - but also leave open - all tabs or something?) Are you sure that’s the name of the addon you’re using?

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      why do you need to keep the things you want to get back to open rather than just using Google to find the page again later?

      If it’s already in memory, that’s one few step to reach it.

      My tab manager can’t search google

      do you find it just by scrolling through all your tabs until a title/favicon looks like what you’re looking for?

      I search my live memory with Tab Manager Plus

      Sadly, it can’t search tab body text, only tab titles.

      if the page/content gets deleted off of the server, you don’t lose it. Is that correct?

      My software should not discard data without my permission. When it runs out of RAM it should dump to disk cache, not delete. But browser have the builtin assumption that the web remembers everything, which is false. I also think bookmarks should save all tab data, all text, all images, all code, all video, and the code should remain as functional as possible. That’s a long way off, currently the only way to do that is freeze the tab with its browser and operating system inside a virtual machine live snapshot.

      I haven’t been able to find any “discard all tabs

      I believe this one can do, discard selected tabs, but not discard all tabs

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/discard/

      Discard is the action where all tab content is deleted, keeping only URL, title and favicon

      I haven’t found discard all tabs either.

      I would like “stop all tabs” to work

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/stop-all-button/

      But it will only work after firefox has cleared the clog, it currently freezes with the rest of the browser.

      • TootSweet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If it’s already in memory, that’s one few step to reach it.

        I search my live memory with Tab Manager Plud

        Oh, so you’re doing something like Googling just to find the page title and then rather than clicking the link in Google, (closing the Google results page, I hope and) searching through your tab titles with Tab Manager Plus to find and switch to the open tab where you already have the page in question open?

        Though, I still don’t understand why you keep the tab open in the first place rather than juat closing the tab when you’re (at least for the moment) done with it and then Googling to find the content again and clicking the appropriate link to get that same content in a new tab when you do need it again. I asked whether the reason was so that if the content is removed from the server, you didn’t lose it, but I don’t think anything you said in your last post answered that question. You did say:

        My software should not discard data without my permission. When it runs out of RAM it should dump to disk cache, not delete.

        Which wasn’t quite a direct answer to my question. And you then directly admit that the browser doesn’t even keep content that’s open in a tab:

        But browser have the builtin assumption that the web remembers everything, which is false.

        So that must not be why you keep content open in tabs, right?

        Is it maybe something like if you keep something open in a tab, the presence of that page title in your tab manager gives you confirmation when you later Google to find the page title that such-and-such particular result in the Google results is indeed the thing you’re looking for and not a different page than the one you were looking for?

        Just as an aside, my web browser use is probably atypical as well. I have my browser forget all cookies, history, cache, etc (basically everything but my bookmarks) every time I fully close it. And I close it every time I switch activities to keep my online personas isolated from each other. (So I’m never logged into my Google account and my Amazon account at the same time, for instance. To reduce targeted ads and such.)

        Also, I’m wondering if something more like a caching proxy with maybe page searching capabilities and finegrained control of what is cached and what isn’t might fill part of your use case, but I still don’t have a firm grasp on your use case.

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m really curious about the workflow you have that needs that many tabs. How does the History and Bookmark functions fall short of what you need?

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s easier to use google than the bookmarks manager, which can’t even find text inside the pages. I do often dump all those thousands of tabs into a bookmarks folder. And it has never happened that I went back into that enormous pile to fetch something that would take hours to find again. I have no use for the history either. A gigantic, alphabetic ordered list of everything I have seen in the last 7 days. Again, easier to just use google.

      The one thing that is better and faster than google, is not closing those tabs that may contain the stuff I need.

      Of course, it’s not really possible to search the text body of open tabs, unless you search them one by one.

      But I’m going to ask for only one computing miracle at a time !

      • optissima@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        What I’d recommend, based on the insistence that seeing to not change your workflow, is to locally download the pages you have open with httrack, wget or a similar application. This would allow you to locally search all your tabs and their contents very quickly without Google, they will load faster because of lack of needing to redownload them, which if I understand correctly Firefox is trying to do at some level.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Thanks, I didn’t know that one.

          I have been experiementing with a transparent proxy like squid or something like Archive Box, to create static pages on the fly and load that.

          But so far I’ve not made something seamless and pleasant to use. It would have to be at least as low friction as using google.

          I am going to try using Mixtral 8x7b to perform natural language search over my archives and pull tabs from the collection of all pages I have ever seen. But that’s still a long way away from being operational !

          • optissima@possumpat.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            …has Google still been giving you the same results recently? This is an extremely weak link in your setup to me. You’d be better off looking at a locally run search engine like peARs or something similar with locally downloaded and indexed files if you insist on using search, and it’ll be waaaay more reliable than an LLM here.

            • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Google is giving me increasingly poor results, I am looking into deploying Searxng locally.

              I really would like to operate my own local crawler and sorting algorithm.

              I will check out the peARs you mentionned !

  • Undaunted@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have no direct solution to you exact problem but your usage of tabs sounds like a nightmare.

    A while back I found Omnivore which works like a charm if you want to “freeze” the contents of a website to read them later. You can also self host it if you like.

    I took it a step further because I love Obsidian as personal knowledge management and I want to have everything in one place. There’s a plugin to sync all your saved pages from Omnivore to Obsidian. In the template for it I then have my marked highlights, the links to the version in Omnivore and the original URL and also the whole content. So I have all of that in markdown which is really nice to work with.

    Maybe that’s a solution you too could be happy with.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thanks, never heard of Omnivore

      “Distraction free. Privacy focused. Open source”

      They do hit the right notes. I was going to try QOwnNotes but I’ll put that on my list.

  • Observer1199@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    The solution to write your own application that does what you want because your workflow is not a use case that browsers are designed for. It’s not bad to wish for features but your workflow is never going to be catered for in a browser and it’s both unreasonable and unrealistic to expect otherwise - hence you need to do it yourself.

    If you can’t or don’t know how to do that yourself, I suggest you listen to the advice everyone else is giving you. Organisation does require ongoing work and given your comments it will likely require a lot of upfront effort to change your browser hygiene habits but once you are more organised it becomes a lot easier and a lot less work to stay on top of things.

    It’s none of my business but I wonder why you feel it’s so important to open 500+ tabs just to buy something small online. Doing research and being informed is good but it seems disproportionate and perhaps talking to a professional might help you with that.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      browser hygiene habits

      You used that term, and frankly I recoil a bit a this term because of the implication that it’s not a deficiency of the software but that it’s the users who are wrong.

      Still, I typed in the phrase into chatgpt

      And I see “reading lists” as an alternative to bookmarks (that I find to be, straight up unusable)

      So I found this reading list addon give a try.

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/reading_list/

      I have a very specific use for a “reading list”, which I take to be something like a FIFO stack of links. And that would be going through youtube videos.

      Putting this in case someone else is reading this thread looking for answers.

      However, it’s a side bar thing, and you have to add links one at a time, can’t select multiple tabs and add them

      As for opening 500+ tabs to buy a thing.

      You do know that sellers now use algorithmic pricing and often there will be hundreds of sellers for the same thing.

      Plus the price will be obfuscated with various artifices that all have to be overcome to find the best seller with the best price.

      Defeating all of that means openning a shit-ton of tabs.

      Here’s an example of the process I’ve designed for aliexpress

      https://github.com/igorlogius/gather-from-tabs/discussions/8

      • Observer1199@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        You used that term, and frankly I recoil a bit a this term because of the implication that it’s not a deficiency of the software but that it’s the users who are wrong.

        I wouldn’t say FF is deficient in this case - not being designed for your exact use case doesn’t mean there’s anything wrong with it.

        As for opening 500+ tabs to buy a thing.

        You do know that sellers now use algorithmic pricing and often there will be hundreds of sellers for the same thing.

        Plus the price will be obfuscated with various artifices that all have to be overcome to find the best seller with the best price.

        Defeating all of that means openning a shit-ton of tabs.

        I usually only buy things if I agree with the price it’s being sold at. If I don’t I will look elsewhere but ultimately I value my time more than money. Extra money can be earned, time cannot 🤷‍♂️ If you have to drive 100 miles to a fuel station to save 2 cent per gallon, are you actually saving money?

        Here’s an example of the process I’ve designed for aliexpress

        https://github.com/igorlogius/gather-from-tabs/discussions/8

        So it’s a script generating all the tabs?

  • Fetus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I terminate Firefox and reopen it any time it’s chewing up my RAM, but I usually don’t have more than 500 tabs open at any one time. My tabs persist when Firefox starts again, but tabs don’t fully load until I click on them again. This saves my memory from getting chewed up immediately, and can usually go a week or so before I need to do it again.